terça-feira, 13 de novembro de 2012

Bill O Reilly and a certain ``changing country``



First of all let's be honest: what Bill O"Reilly was saying is that the so-called ``minorities`` have different political views than the ``white stablishment`` ( whatever that means). So, acording to his logic, a changing demographic would be a tail wind for Mr Obama's reelection.That assumption is wrong on many levels:

1) The altruistic white male.

 So acording to O"Reilly, the ``old America`` made of the ``white stablishment`` had a diferent view of government.One of limited action.One of restraint.That view is just wrong.If we look as a simple table of expenditures to GDP ( i'm too lazy to put it here but it can be easily found on the web) we can see the the US governement has been growing non-stop for a century.Why to put the blame on a ``changing country`` ? Besides, it seems funny and naive to think of the ``stablishment`` as made of people that do not want their social security checks to clear, their Medicare or Medicaid funds beeing delivered, etc.The only people that ``want stuff``, of course, are minorities.

2) Minorities vote Obama and ``want stuff`` Jews vote Obama because ..? 

As  we  all know, Obama led among single woman, latinos, jews, yong people, etc.I would like Mr O "Reilly , being a sstrong Israel suporter, tell me why minorities vote Obama because they ``want stuff`` and jews vote Obama because other altruistic reasons not having to do with wanting stuff? 


3) Fox News

Being a libertarian, i have different views than Mr O Reilly.I believe in freedom not only in economic terms but also in personal terms.In fact, were i american, i would have cast my vote for Mr Gary Johnson of the libertarian party ( not having Ron Paul as an option).Then, i would like he to tell me why does he and the Fox news ``stablishment`` believe in less freedom and want ``more stuff ( restricting the right of gays to marry in this case) than i do? 

Hope to hear from him.

terça-feira, 6 de novembro de 2012

Meu Pirão primeiro!



Basicamente só existem duas formas de se eleger como vereador no Brasil.Nenhuma das duas envolve ter nenhum tipo de ideia ou proposta.
São elas: ser um representante de um determinado bairro ou região da cidade ou então ser representante de uma determinada classe ou categoria profissional.Os eleitores, em uma grande filosofia de ``se a farinha é pouca, meu pirão primeiro`` votam desproporcionalmente nas eleições municipais nestes candidatos, que eles fantasiam, irão lutar pela melhora do lugar onde vivem ou pela sua classe de trabalho.
Os bairros de suburbio e da ``elite`` são igualmente pecadores nesse ato.Apenas para ficar no Rio de Janeiro, são exemplos de vereadores de curral eleitoral: Rosa Fernandes, a mais botada na ultima eleição ( Iraja/ Vila da Penha) , Leila do Flamengo ( zona Sul) , e não nos esqueçamos, o proprio prefeito, Eduardo Paes, começou sua carreira sendo o vereador mais votado da eleição de municipal de 1996, como o candidato da Barra, o que mostra que os eleitores da zona Oeste praticam a  filosofia do ``meu pirão primeiro`` exatamente como todos os demais.No que tange a categorias profissionais, praticamente todas puderam ser vistas nas ultimas eleições: médicos, bombeiros, professores, policiais, e qualquer outra atividade que se possa imaginar.
Um dos motivos disso, sem duvida, é o velho ranço brasileiro que a politica serve para tentar se extrair beneficios do estado.O estado aqui, sempre foi assim: quem é insider, extrai para si e para os seus uma infinidade de benesses.Curioso tambem, o desconhecimento dos eleitores.Teoricamente ao menos, a função de um vereador é legislar.Mas Rosa Fernandes se elege promovendo calcamentos em ruas, iniciativas governamentais e semi-governamentais quase como se fosse uma pequena prefeita do bairro, quando na verdade teoricamente sua função seria criar  e revogar leis.Isso mostra uma segunda característica: como os eleitores brasileiros acreditam que estado= executivo.Infelizmente não estão muito errados, pois realmente o executivo é muito mais poderoso que os demais poderes no Brasil.Mas isso fica para uma outra postagem.

sexta-feira, 26 de outubro de 2012

Dear Mr Romney, time for your class


Why is the US government afraid of this man?


Prison May Be the Next Stop on a Gold Currency Journey


Michal Czerwonka for The New York Times
Described by some as the "Rosa Parks of the constitutional currency movement,” Bernard von NotHaus managed over the last decade to get more than 60 million real dollars’ worth of his precious metal-backed currency into circulation across the country.



MALIBU, Calif. — High above the cliff tops and the beach bars, up a winding mountain road, in a borrowed house on someone else’s ranch, an unusual criminal is waiting for his fate.

Michal Czerwonka for The New York Times
Mr. von NotHaus was convicted of using precious metals to back a currency he called the Liberty Dollar, which he says was “a private voluntary currency” for those conducting business outside the government’s purview.
His name is Bernard von NotHaus, and he is a professed “monetary architect” and a maker of custom coins found guilty last spring of counterfeiting charges for minting and distributing a form of private money called the Liberty Dollar.
Described by some as “the Rosa Parks of the constitutional currency movement,” Mr. von NotHaus managed over the last decade to get more than 60 million real dollars’ worth of his precious metal-backed currency into circulation across the country — so much, and with such deep penetration, that the prosecutor overseeing his case accused him of “domestic terrorism” for using them to undermine the government.
Of course, if you ask him what caused him to be living here in exile, waiting with the rabbits for his sentence to be rendered, he will give a different account of what occurred.
“This is the United States government,” he said in an interview last week. “It’s got all the guns, all the surveillance, all the tanks, it has nuclear weapons, and it’s worried about some ex-surfer guy making his own money? Give me a break!”
The story of Mr. von NotHaus, from his beginnings as a hippie, can sound at times as if Ken Kesey had been paid in marijuana to write a script on spec for Representative Ron Paul. At 68, Mr. von NotHaus faces more than 20 years in prison for his crimes, and this decisive chapter of his tale has come, coincidentally, at a moment when his obsessions of 40 years — monetary policy, dollar depreciation and the Federal Reserve Bank — have finally found their place in the national discourse.
A native of Kansas City, Mr. von NotHaus first became enticed by making money while living with his companion, Talena Presley, without a car or electric power in a commune of like-minded dropouts in a nameless village on the Big Island in Hawaii. It was 1974, and Mr. von NotHaus, 30 and ignorant of economics, experienced “an epiphany,” he said, which resulted in the writing of a 20-page financial manifesto titled “To Know Value.”
In it he described his conviction that money has a moral aspect and that any loss in its value will cause a corresponding loss in social and political values. It was only three years after President Richard M. Nixon had removed the country from the gold standard, and Mr. von NotHaus, a gold enthusiast, began buying gold from local jewelers and selling it to his friends.
One day, he recalled, “we were all sitting around thinking, ‘Wow, we ought to do something with this gold.’ And I said: ‘Yeah, we could make coins. People love coins. We could have our own money!’ ”
Within a year, he had established the Royal Hawaiian Mint, a private — not royal — producer of collectible coins. Hitchhiking to a library in the county seat of Hilo, he said, he looked up “minting” in the encyclopedia and soon was turning out gold and silver medallions with images of volcanos and the Kona Coast.
So went the better part of 20 years. Then came 1991, which saw the emergence of a successful local currency in Ithaca, N.Y., called the Ithaca Hour. The 1990s were a time of great ferment in the local-money world with activists and academics writing books and papers, like Judith Shelton’s “Money Meltdown.” Mr. von NotHaus, traveling with his sons, Random and Xtra, to adventuresome locations, like Machu Picchu, read these seminal works.
“I had been working on it since 1974,” he testified at his federal trial in North Carolina. “It was time to do something.”
The Constitution grants to Congress the power “to coin money” and to “regulate the Value thereof” — but it does not explicitly grant an exclusive right to do such things. There are legal-tender laws that regulate production of government currency and counterfeiting laws that prohibit things like “uttering” gold or silver coins “for use as current money.”
Mr. von NotHaus claims he never meant the Liberty Dollar to be used as legal tender. He says he created it as “a private voluntary currency” for those conducting business outside the government’s purview. His guiding metaphor is the relationship between the Postal Service and FedEx. “What happened in the FedEx model,” he testified, “is that they” — a private company offering services the government did not — “brought competition to the post office.”
To introduce the Liberty Dollar in 1998, Mr. von NotHaus moved from Hawaii to Evansville, Ind., where he joined forces with Jim Thomas, who for several years had been publishing a magazine called Media Bypass, whose pages were filled with conspiracy theories and interviews with militia members, even Timothy McVeigh.
Working from the magazine’s office, Mr. von NotHaus lived in a mobile home and promoted his nascent currency to “patriot groups” on Mr. Thomas’s mailing list while reaching an agreement with Sunshine Minting Inc., in Idaho, to produce the Liberty Dollar. His marketing scheme was simple: he drove around the country in a Cadillac trying to persuade local merchants like hair salons and restaurants to use his coins and to offer them as change to willing customers.


(Page 2 of 2)
Banks, of course, did not accept his money; however, to ensure that it found its way only into hands that wanted to use it, Mr. von NotHaus placed a toll-free number and a URL address on the currency he produced. If people mistakenly got hold of it, they could mail it back to Evansville and receive its equivalent in actual dollar bills.


Now jump ahead to 2004. A detective in Asheville, N.C., learned one day that a client of a credit union had to tried to pass a “fake coin” at one its local branches. An investigation determined that some business acquaintances of Mr. von NotHaus were, court papers say, allied with the sovereign citizens’ movement, an antigovernment group.
Federal agents infiltrated the Liberty Dollar outfit as well as its educational arm, Liberty Dollar University.
In 2006, with millions of the coins in circulation in more than 80 cities, the United States Mint sent Mr. von NotHaus a letter advising that the use of his currency “as circulating money” was a federal crime.
He ignored this advice,and in 2007, federal agents raided the offices in Evansville, seizing, among other things, copper dollars embossed with the image of Mr. Paul.
Two years later, Mr. von NotHaus was arrested on fraud and counterfeiting charges, accused of having used the Liberty Dollar’s parent corporation — Norfed, the National Organization for Repeal of the Federal Reserve — to mount a conspiracy against the United States.
At his federal trial, witnesses testified to the Liberty Dollar’s criminal similitude to standard American coins. They said his coins included images of Lady Liberty and cheekily reversed “In God We Trust” to “Trust in God.” Then again, his coins were made of real gold and silver, as American coins are not, and came in different sizes and unusual denominations of $10 and $20.
In his own defense, Mr. von NotHaus testified about a “philanthropic mission” to combat devaluation with a currency based on precious metals and asserted that he was not involved in “a radical armed offense against the government or their money.”
It was, of course, to no avail; and in 2011, a jury found him guilty after a 90-minute deliberation.
These days, Mr. von NotHaus paces shoeless in a mansion, in the hills above the ocean, that was lent to him by a friend. His sentencing has yet to be scheduled, and this leaves time for reflection. He feeds the hummingbirds outside his window. He reads books on fiat currency. He is even writing a book — on the gold standard, of course.
“The thing that fires me up the most,” he will say, “is this is what happens: When money goes bad, people go crazy. Do you know why? Because they can’t exist without value. Value is intrinsic in man.”

quinta-feira, 18 de outubro de 2012

About the Joe Rogan Youtube video





While i am a lifelong fan of Joe Rogan´s worldview ( specially his public support for US presidential candidate Ron Paul) i would amplify on some of his comments on the Youtube video we recently posted on this Blog ( http://libertarianplanet.blogspot.com.br/2012/10/joe-rogan-tells-it-all.html) 
I don´t disagree at all with the notion that there´s an active industry that profits from the constant engagement of the USA in various wars.However, i don´t think this is the only reason, as his video implies,  that makes  the US fight new wars all the time.

Bellow some aditional reasons for the US military industrial complex´s sucess and particularly some reasons for the second Iraq war: 

a) Personal preferences.

 George W Bush, according to multiples reports, lacked a sense of purpose and pride during the early part of his presidency( especially before 09/11, when he had just won a bitterly contested election and before he took advantage of the natural sense of commotion because of the terorist attacks ) .He always had profound admirations for the US military power.So, he wanted to be a ''war president''.

b) The republican right

 US right wind ideologues came up with a bizarre term called judeo-christian culture.Basically it is a worldview that verges on supremacism that basically rejects any wordview that they deem unreligious, uncapitalist , leftist or anti-Israel.To stay in the Iraq War example, George W Bush was a fervorous evangelical follower who had a strong worldview based on this right wing ideology.So it is natural that the two countries considered to be the biggest Israel adversaries in the Middle East are being fought by the US: first Iraq, with in the excuse of having wapons of mass descruction ( in the aftermath of 09/11 Bush took advantage of an american lack of knowledge about the distance between Al Quaeda and Saddam hussein) The second foe, Iran, is going to face war anytime now, this time with not any excuse about why this war would be of any interest for the american people.

c) Supremacist ideologues that think the world should be shaped by the american agenda.

ETC.


In sort, i don´t think joe Rogan ignores these points.Of course money also plays a proeminent role.I think he kept the argument in the industrial-military complex for simplicity sake and to have his point across.
Anyway, my hat is off to him, for being a celebrity not afraid of speaking the truth.


quarta-feira, 17 de outubro de 2012

Election time


The One Country Whose Elections Are Crazier Than the USA's

  94,068 views
From Cracked.com 



Email

Election season in Brazil closely resembles the race for fifth grade class president. It is what democracy hallucinates after dropping acid in front of Cartoon Network.

#3. The Candidates Use the Same Fake Names You Enter on a Bowling Scorecard

This year in Brazil, there are five people named Batman running for various offices, along with 16 Barack Obamas and a pair of James Bonds. The crowded ballot also includes Lady Gaga, Jimmy Carter, John Kennedy, bin Laden, Zig Zag Clown, a guy named Elvis Didn't Die, someone called Kung Fu Fatty and Geraldo Wolverine. The list of candidates reads like the starting lineup of the first team the Bad News Bears ever defeated, or the scheduled euthanasia docket for a bunch of retired greyhounds.
Brazil has around 30 prominent political parties, which you may notice is about the same number of teams as the NFL. That equals at least 60 or 70 people screaming for your vote at any given time, so some intrepid lawmakers decided that it would be a good idea if they were allowed to run under pretty much whatever names they wanted as a way to distinguish themselves in the thrashing maniacal sea of candidates. However, the fact that so many of them settle on the same made-up name suggests that they perhaps misunderstood the purpose of being able to rechristen themselves "Superman's Erection" and compete for votes.

#2. Candidates Wear Costumes

Remember Geraldo Wolverine? (What a ridiculous question -- you will never forget Geraldo Wolverine.) Would it surprise you to learn that he actually dresses like Wolverine, with a leather jacket, bushy sideburns and metal claws, and drives around in a car with his face painted on it? Because it shouldn't. Because he does.
And he's far from the only person who treats politics like an office Halloween party -- as a general rule, candidates wear costumes, because unlike U.S. politicians, who claim that they will do anything for a vote, people running for office in Brazil literally will do anything for a vote. One man, running under the name Obama BH, actually looks, dresses and has adopted all the mannerisms of the real Fred Armisen.

nytimes.com
... that's actually pretty good.

#1. Everybody Can Run, and They Do

A clown won a congressional seat in Brazil's 2010 elections.

telegraph.co.uk
This is not a stock photo. This is the actual man who actually won the election.
Campaigning under the name Tiririca (which translates to "Grumpy"), he claimed a landslide victory, receiving more votes than any other candidate for any other office that election. This is in spite of the fact that:
1) He is an actual clown (see photo above).
2) There is evidence that he is illiterate.
3) His actual campaign slogan was "What does a congressman do? The truth is, I don't know. But vote for me and I'll tell you."
4) Refer back to 1.
Geraldo Wolverine was a driving instructor with no prior political experience of any kind (although we hope that his students had to drive that same car). His big claim to fame was being rejected as a cast member of the reality show Big Brother Brazil.

nytimes.com
Before this photo existed, that is.
And in 2001, an infamous Brazilian criminal organization called First Capital Command (PCC) orchestrated 28 nearly simultaneous prison riots across the country. A year later, one of their members ran for Congress and in no way attempted to conceal the fact that he was essentially a member of Nicolas Cage's gang in Face/Off. In fact, he celebrated it with catchy slogans like "From now on the PCC will use elections as its machine gun -- a machine gun loaded with votes," which you may notice is a sentence that will get you tackled by the Secret Service.


Luis Prada is a columnist for ManCave.com, and you can follow him on Tumblr and Twitter.



Joe Rogan tells it all